Target Top Security Officer Reporting to CIO Seen As a Mistake

SPEAK YOUR MIND

Target-logoIn hiring its first CISO to prevent another massive data breach, Target made a mistake in not having the top security officer report directly to the chief executive, experts say.

Target hired this week Brad Maiorino, who was chief information security and information technology risk officer at General Motors. In his previous position, Maiorino overhauled the automaker’s global information security organization.

Target’s latest executive hire comes six months after reporting a massive breach in which 40 million credit card numbers and 70 million customer addresses, phone numbers and other personal data were stolen from the retailer’s computers.

Experts commended Target Friday for hiring a CISO, but questioned its decision to have the executive report to Chief Information Officer Bob DeRodes, hired in April, and not directly to interim CEO and President John Mulligan. They worried that security might not get a high enough priority, if the CISO is not equal to the CIO.

“There is always a trade-off when it comes to implementing security, but as we have come to learn, security should no longer play second fiddle to other considerations,” Al Pascual, analyst at Javelin Strategy & Research, said. “The CIO and CISO are really complimentary roles, and to be truly effective they need to act as partners within an organization.”

The CISO’s job is to establish a company’s overall approach to security and to take full responsibility for the successes and failures of policies and procedures. The chief security exec is also responsible for making sure the company’s board and CEO are aware of any technical problems.

To be effective, the executive should be able to present arguments for large IT security expenditures directly to the CEO and the chief financial officer, who can weigh the request against the money the CIO wants to spend on IT operations.

The balance between IT operations and security could get tilted toward the former, if the CIO has the final say.

“CIOs have to deliver on projects and keep things operating and quite often security controls and measures slow things down,” Richard Stiennon, chief research analyst for IT-Harvest, said. “So they launch things in an insecure mode and of course, after that it’s too late.”

(Continue reading HERE…)

SOURCE: CIO.com | Antone Gonsalves

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *